[aprssig] Object Definition vs third-party traffic?
Bob Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduWed Jun 10 15:49:28 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [aprssig] Object Definition vs third-party traffic?
- Next message: [aprssig] Object Definition vs third-party traffic?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> This in not best method if defining objects! > Better use Object indeficator ";" and use > ham call of originator in packet, > for example: > > call_of_originator>APOBJ: > ;146.52*!2806. N/08039. WrPHG7260 NWS MELBOURNE > > In third party this packet should be some like this: > WX4MLB-3>BEACON: > }call_of_originator>APOBJ,TCPIP:;146.52>!2806. N/08039. > WrPHG7260 NWS MELBOURNE This is the correct approach, but the format is not correct. The ;objectnam*DDHHMMzDDMM.mmN/DDDMM.mmW$text is the correct format. The object name must be 9 bytes (padded with spaces) and the TIME field must be there. We use the time of 111111z when the time is not important. Bob, WB4APR >Possible timestamp should be also present before coordinates... > > >73, Sergej >uz2hz > > >_______________________________________________ >aprssig mailing list >aprssig at tapr.org >https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
- Previous message: [aprssig] Object Definition vs third-party traffic?
- Next message: [aprssig] Object Definition vs third-party traffic?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
