[aprssig] Object Definition vs third-party traffic?
rttyman rttyman at ukr.netWed Jun 10 19:12:58 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [aprssig] Object Definition vs third-party traffic?
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS touch-tone
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> This is the correct approach, but the format is not correct. The > ;objectnam*DDHHMMzDDMM.mmN/DDDMM.mmW$text is the correct format. The object name must be 9 bytes > (padded with spaces) and the TIME field must be there. > We use the time of 111111z when the time is not important. > Bob, WB4APR Bob TU for correction. Aprs specification was not near me, when I am wrote answer and example of format bit mistaked, but I said that timestamp must be also. 73, Sergej uz2hz
- Previous message: [aprssig] Object Definition vs third-party traffic?
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS touch-tone
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
