[aprssig] aprssig Digest, Vol 60, Issue 25
G0JXN Jim g0jxn.jim at ntlworld.comThu Jun 25 13:23:33 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS-SIG (... proposal for a world wide APRS net on 20m?)
- Next message: [aprssig] aprssig Digest, Vol 60, Issue 25
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Guys Stephen You miss my point. Yes FSK only has one carrier as does FM but APRS effectively has two. So can Carson's rule be applied to a two carrier system? ----- Original Message ----- From: <aprssig-request at tapr.org> To: <aprssig at tapr.org> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 1:00 PM Subject: aprssig Digest, Vol 60, Issue 25 > That's the whole point of Carson's Rule -- it takes into account the > total energy in ALL of the sidebands. If it defines the effective > bandwidth as being where 98% of the energy is located, then only 2% of > the energy would remain in ALL of the higher order sidebands combined. > > > > > In any event the argument is flawed in that an FM signal only has one > > carrier that moves between the deviation limits not two as suggested. > > > > Nothing was said about "two carriers". With FSK, there is only ONE RF > signal moving +/- 100 Hz from a center frequency (i.e. "carrier > frequency") midway between the mark and space frequencies. Since you > never have "no modulation" (i.e. you are always sending either a "1" or > a "0"), the "unmodulated" center resting frequency of the carrier never > appears.You are always at either "peak deviation high" or "peak > deviation low". 73 Jim, G0JXN
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS-SIG (... proposal for a world wide APRS net on 20m?)
- Next message: [aprssig] aprssig Digest, Vol 60, Issue 25
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
