[aprssig] Killing objects
Tapio Sokura oh2kku at iki.fiSat May 2 15:20:32 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [aprssig] Killing objects
- Next message: [aprssig] Killing objects
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrew Rich wrote: > Killing off objects > Is it necessary to send the lat and lon of an object you are sending > kill for ? You should at least have a syntactically valid lat/lon in the kill packet, if you don't have the exact lat/lon of the "live" object. At least the parsers I have intimate knowledge of, won't process an object packet, dead or alive, if it doesn't contain a lat/lon. Also if you have a generic lat/lon in the kill packet instead of the real location of the object, your kill packet might not make it to the area the object was located at, in the APRS-IS (due to location filters). Tapio
- Previous message: [aprssig] Killing objects
- Next message: [aprssig] Killing objects
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
