[aprssig] Re : Re : NWS ON rf
rttyman rttyman at ukr.netSun May 10 21:26:30 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re : Re : NWS ON rf
- Next message: [aprssig] Re : Re : NWS ON rf
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, John. >> > Not necessarily Sergej. We have often use tactical calls on RF here > in Ireland, with the Callsign being in elsewhere in the transmission. > de John > EI7IG If you use its locally is all on your own risk, but when its pass to Internet backbone and if this call begin with prefix char of other country (not EIxxxx) your tactical data become just a QRM for other hams in network outside area where this tactic is actual. Filtering not possible by "callsign present in other place of transmission". Think you will be not happy if from backbone will came "fault" positions with EIxxx in source and mixed up with real EI APRS traffic. Same for me. The solution for future is use zero figure before tactical signs or place tactical labels on map with use of Objects + original call in source. GL, Sergej uz2hz
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re : Re : NWS ON rf
- Next message: [aprssig] Re : Re : NWS ON rf
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
