[aprssig] Re : Re : NWS ON rf
steve.jones at rogers.com
Sun May 10 19:01:36 CDT 2009
On May 10, 2009, at 6:28 PM, rttyman wrote:
> This will be solution in your case for Italian hams not to see "ICP"
> on their end, if this "ICP" sign come to APRS-IS. But Zero not
> to any ham prefix 0ICP would not be a problem.
What exactly would the problem be?
The only problem I could see would be if somebody was foolish enough
to gate all Italian traffic to RF.
Once again, setting a geographic range filter centered on Italy with
an appropriate range would keep out all tactical traffic originated
elsewhere that matches the callsign filter.
It's something easily setup on *your* end and doesn't require the
other 99% of hams out there who don't seem to mind tactical traffic on
the APRS-IS to do anything.
Steve <steve.jones at rogers.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the aprssig