[aprssig] WIDEn-N question
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduWed Nov 4 13:41:42 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [aprssig] WIDEn-N question
- Next message: [aprssig] WIDEn-N question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I also encourage the Big DIGI's not to > respond to WIDE1, because they will pick > up the WIDE2. Responding to both, the > Big DIGI transmits twice. Actually I need to clarify that.... There are several issues here: 1) If the big digi does not respond to W1-1, then the big digi's are ignoring ALL mobiles in its footprint that are not covered by a fill-in WIDE1-1. And since the big digi's have probably 10 to 100 times the coverage of the small fill-in's, then this approach essentially castrates the big digis... The big digis have to respond to both for this system to work. 2) Under New-N paradigm, the big digi's will never digi any packet twice. If they hear it first, they do the W1-1 and then wont do the W2-1 later. If the W1-1 hears it first, then the big digi will only do the W2-1 once also. 3) Even if both the big digi and the fill-in hear it at the same time. Both will TX at the same time (Dwait=0) and no one will hear the W1-1 because the big digi will saturate the whole area. That is the beauty of the W1-1,W2-1 two hop system. It works. And it only takes up ONE slot time at each outward tier, yet it can use a Fill-in if that is all that hears it. And there are no dupes causesd by it. Evey digi will digipeat it once and only once. That is the intent. > I also encourage Fill In DIGI to just respond to WIDE1-1. Yes, that is essential. > I recommend WIDE1-1,WIDE2-2 for mobiles in WPA. Great! Bob, WB4APR
- Previous message: [aprssig] WIDEn-N question
- Next message: [aprssig] WIDEn-N question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
