Order Tray | Contact Us | Home | SIG Lists

[aprssig] WIDEn-N question My Summary

Cap Pennell cap at cruzio.com
Thu Nov 5 00:28:49 UTC 2009


Best routine (to help us all share our slow VHF channel) is to disregard any
recommendation for any three-hop digipath.  Problem solved.  
Remember, with so many IGates and fill-in digis today, most of us can well
meet the needs of our particular intended audience by routinely setting our
VHF transmitters to use a digipath of only WIDE1-1.  Simply to suit our
audience's purposes, we may not even need to transmit our data quite so
frequently on VHF either!  <grin>
73, Cap

> -----Original Message-----
> From: aprssig-bounces at tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces at tapr.org] On
> Behalf Of Steve Noskowicz
> Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 7:17 AM
> To: 'TAPR APRS Mailing List'; bruninga at usna.edu
> Subject: Re: [aprssig] WIDEn-N question My Summary
> 
> 
> 
> Bob,
> 
> Sorry 'bout that.
> 
> Here is what I'm testing my understanding on:
> 
> /nit flag on/
> 
> I think this may be called an oxymoron - a (necessariyl) self
> conflicting standard.
> 
> Though this is "recommended" for mobile 3-hop :  WIDE1-1,WIDE2-2

<snip>




More information about the aprssig mailing list