[aprssig] Any audio recordings of 144.390 MHz ?
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduSat Oct 24 16:29:25 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [aprssig] Any audio recordings of 144.390 MHz ?
- Next message: [aprssig] Any audio recordings of 144.390 MHz ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> More precise measurement would take radio > RSSI signal, and account fraction of time > when it is over some defined treshold. > That would know not only of successfully > decoded packets, but also of failures > due to two transmitters colliding at too > even signal power levels. Yes! Exactly, Without RSSI, counting packet decodes is a completely meaningless statistic as far as channel loading is concerned. Decodes only show success. There is no way for decodes to show all the failures. And without comparing the two, then there is no conclusions to be drawn as to network performance. Lets say 10 decodes a minute is measured. This could either be a near perfect channel with only 10 users at a 1 minute rate getting 100% success... Or it could also equally be a totally saturated channel with 100 users and only 10% of them have any success. A bad channel indeed. That is why the ALOHA ALGORITHM is encouraged to be installed in EVERY client SYSTEM. This is a measurement we came up with in APRS that can measure performace against the number of users and expected number of packets. The output is a circular RANGE based entirely on what is heard on the local channel and is independent of geography and density. In Wyoming, it may be an ALOHA range circle of 150 miles covering 70,000 square miles or in Los Angeles it is a 10 mile circle covering only 300 square miles. But both APRS channels should give equal performance if EVERYONE keeps their HOPS within their circle. This is why all digipeaters in the LA area only digipeat ONE HOP. And in Wyoming, 2 HOPS works perfectly well out 150 miles in all directions. See www.aprs.org/aloha.html Unfortunately, I do not think that the APRS-IS web pages can do any meaningful ALOHA calculations, because the calculation must be done on what a single receiver hears at a single location. And since the APRS-IS throws away dupes, this makes remote monitoring impossible. IDEA!!! Since the OUTPUT of an ALOHA caclullation at any one site is a single NUMBER, we could ask ALL IGATES to make continuous ALOHA calculations and INCLUDE their ALOHA RANGE in their IGATE beacon. This way, we COULD capture this information for local, regional and national analysis!!! Is anyone actively writing Igate code that wants to add this? Bob, WB4APR
- Previous message: [aprssig] Any audio recordings of 144.390 MHz ?
- Next message: [aprssig] Any audio recordings of 144.390 MHz ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
