[aprssig] /A= altitude question
Bob Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduSun Aug 8 00:26:06 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [aprssig] /A= altitude question
- Next message: [aprssig] aprssig Digest, Vol 74, Issue 7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
For what it is worth: The /A=XXXXXX altitude protocol is *not for antennas*. It is for balloons and aircraft. Altitude means nothing by itself to radio range. That is what PHG data is for. I see far too many stations cluttering up the air with useless /A=XXXXXX entries... Bob, WB4APR ---- Original message ---- >Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 21:48:16 -0700 >From: aprssig-bounces at tapr.org (on behalf of Greg Clark <k7rkt at bigredbee.com>) >Subject: Re: [aprssig] /A= altitude question >To: TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org> > > Guilty as charged -- negative altitude numbers are > not something I have a lot of experience with. > I'll take a look at it, but living at an altitude > of 100+ meters ASL, it's a little difficult for me > to 'simulate' without driving to the coast myself. > I'd recommend ignoring those numbers as well if you > can. > I *have* noticed that when my unit powers up, it can > generate some strange altitude numbers for the first > packet it transmits -- any idea if this is an issue > related to powerup? Or do you > see multiple packets that look like this -- if > you've got some more examples of malformed packets, > that would certainly help. > Regards, > Greg Clark K7RKT > BigRedBee, LLC > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Lynn W. Deffenbaugh > (Mr) <ldeffenb at homeside.to> wrote: > > From aprs101.pdf (search for it and read a copy): > > Altitude in Comment Text — The comment may > contain an altitude value, > in the form /A=aaaaaa, where aaaaaa is the > altitude in feet. For example: > /A=001234. The altitude may appear anywhere in the > comment. > > No, /A=000-17 is not a valid altitude. My client > would simply ignore it, and leave it in the > comment text because it looks for /A= followed by > a valid 6 digit number. It does allow for a > minus sign and 5 digits, but NOT for a non-number > as this is. If you know it's a BigRedBee, I'd > suggest contacting them to get their firmware > fixed. > > Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows > Mobile and Win32 > > PS. On the transmitting side, my client will > only transmit an altitude if it is greater than 0. > I know there are places on the planet where <0 > is valid, but they are fewer and further between > than GPSs that indicate negatives when people are > driving around at or just above sea level. > > VK6 UFO wrote: > > G'day, I've just joined this mailing list so > apologies for questions that have already been > dealt with. > > I'm writing a small program for local users > which can monitor local traffic (via AGW PE and > a receiver) and react to certain events. > One thing I've noticed is that there's no spec I > can find for altitude using /A=###### which > accounts for values below sealevel. I first came > across this when some mobile stations are > reporting like this: > > 2010-08-07 02:52:22 UTC: > VK6ZMS-9>APBL10,VK6KSB-3*,WIDE2-2,qAR,VK6GHZ:!3232.15S/11544.66EP236/000/A=000-17 > > VK6ZMS-9 is using a BigRedBee and no doubt his > GPS receiver is reporting his altitude below > sealevel. His location at the time was next to > the coast so it could be an error from his GPS > receiver or he may have actually been below > sealevel... I'm not familiar with the terrain > there. I've adjusted my software to allow for > this format anyway. > aprs.fi <http://aprs.fi> seems to treat reports > like that as not an altitude report so it ends > up in the comment text. > I guess my question is.. is this altitude report > valid or should it be something else? Is there > documentation somewhere that would clear it up? > > Thanks. > -- > ——————— > Rob VK6UFO > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at tapr.org > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at tapr.org > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >________________ >_______________________________________________ >aprssig mailing list >aprssig at tapr.org >https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
- Previous message: [aprssig] /A= altitude question
- Next message: [aprssig] aprssig Digest, Vol 74, Issue 7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
