Order Tray | Contact Us | Home | SIG Lists

[aprssig] Modem tones, the KPC3+, and Bell 202

Phil N6TCT phil_aprssig at lapsley.org
Wed Aug 11 14:50:22 UTC 2010


Stephen H. Smith wrote:
> You can't just use a 202 (or even a V.23) modem as a replacement for a
> KPC3+.   A TNC is far more than just a modem.  It's a "PAD" (Packet
> assembler/disassembler) that buffers a block of data to send, and then
> adds sending and destination callsigns, routing information,
> error-detection checksums, etc to the payload data.    A regular
> "dumb" 202 modem would require a considerable amount of software on
> the host computer to emulate the functions of a TNC.
Sorry, let me rephrase my question.  I wasn't suggesting using an actual
Bell 202 modem vs. a V.23 modem; I understand the difference between a
modem and a TNC.  What I was asking was really two questions:

(1) is the underlying modulation scheme used in AX.25 Bell 202 (i.e.,
1200/2200) or V.23 (i.e., 1300/2300)?  I have always understood it to be
Bell 202.

(2) if the answer to question 1 is indeed Bell 202, then why would a
Kantronics KPC3+ be using V.23, and is this likely to cause
interoperability problems, or is the 100 Hz difference in AFSK tones
"close enough"?

Thanks!

Phil, N6TCT


 



More information about the aprssig mailing list