[aprssig] Subject: Re: SKY1 - callsign? Wayne County, Ohio.

[ml41782]

I remember the stories of  cutting coax, pins in the coax and or pulling down 
the antennas. 


Your right. It is so much easier to locate them with trackers




________________________________
From: "Wes Johnston, AI4PX" <wes at ai4px.com>
To: ml41782 <ml41782 at yahoo.com>; TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org>
Sent: Thu, August 12, 2010 11:12:17 AM
Subject: Re: [aprssig] Subject: Re: SKY1 - callsign? Wayne County, Ohio.

It's really kinda silly to run a tracker with no license... it's not like the 
good old days when we had to track a repeater jammer with attenuated HT antennas 
and pull up under their car port and blow CQ on the horn.  No sir, not like that 
at all... hihi.   

Wes
---
God help those who do not help themselves.



On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:57, ml41782 <ml41782 at yahoo.com> wrote:

As long as we are information gatherers and no one gets the idea to do some role 
playing and try and pull equipment I agree . We gather as much as possible and 
present our case if the individual wont correct the problem. 

>
>Mike 
>
>
>
>
________________________________
 From: Gregg Wonderly <gregg at wonderly.org> 
>
>To: TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org>
>Cc: ml41782 <ml41782 at yahoo.com>
>Sent: Thu, August 12, 2010 9:44:33 AM
>Subject: Re: [aprssig] Subject: Re: SKY1 - callsign? Wayne County, Ohio.
> 
>
>Look what happened to CB radio...  The FCC became overwhelmed and essentially 
>gave up.  If we don't self police, then we will end up without FCC support...
>
>Gregg Wonderly
>W5GGW
>
>Steve Noskowicz wrote:
>> --- On Wed, 8/11/10, ml41782 <ml41782 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> 
>> ... I dont know what it would take to get the FCC involved in a clean up of the 
>>unlicensed user. It sounds like it needs to be done.  We dont want to take the 
>>law into our own hands. 
>>
>> Mike K4MQF
>> 
>> 
>> Actually, we do ... up to a point.  We self-police.
>> 
>> Some 'friendly education' is he first step. A ham could have simply messed up, 
>>or forgot, or got a little carried away.
>> 
>> Someone could simply be ignorant, stupid, wanting to get away with something.
>> 
>> If you run into arrogance, then some solid, irrefutable evidence is required to 
>>get the FCC to act.  The more discovery we do, the easier it is go get Charlie 
>>moving.
>> 
>> Currently doing Utility noise and repeater jammer investigations.
>> 73, Steve, K9DCI
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>      
>> _______________________________________________
>> aprssig mailing list
>> aprssig at tapr.org
>> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>> 
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>aprssig mailing list
>aprssig at tapr.org
>https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>
>



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20100812/4018656f/attachment.htm>