[aprssig] Object Timestamps and 111111
hessu at hes.iki.fi
Tue Dec 14 06:50:51 CST 2010
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, Al Wolfe wrote:
> What about just turning off timestamps? It would make for shorter packets.
> About 80 to 90 percent of the timestamps that I see are wrong. It seems that
> most APRS users using timestamps don't know what day it is or haven't
> mastered GMT offsets.
They're often incorrect, right, also in timestamped position packets (not
objects/items). But in those, even incorrect timestamps can be useful, at
least if they change in every packet. They can be used to detect duplicate
packets in the receiving end, even if the duplicate packet would have some
sort of corruption elsewhere.
It would be very useful if the protocol had some sort of sequence number
in the transmitted position packets, so that the receiver could detect and
reorder packets which arrive in the wrong order, or when duplicates
appear. That happens a lot for a number of reasons, causing cars to jump
back and forth to old positions. The timestamp can be used in place of a
sequence number, although it takes up more space.
More information about the aprssig