[aprssig] "Best" packet decoder solution
Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr) ldeffenb at homeside.toMon Dec 27 16:02:09 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [aprssig] "Best" packet decoder solution
- Next message: [aprssig] "Best" packet decoder solution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
By "decode APRS data packets" to you mean decode the ASCII text of a packet and glean all useful information from it? Or do you mean decode an APRS packet received over-the-air? Is that 1200 baud AX.25 on 2m? 9600 baud AX.25 on 2m or 70cm? 300 baud AX.25 on HF (30m for instance)? PSK-63 or GMSK-250 or some-such as done by APRS Messenger? And are you referring to decoding a 100% purely transmitted packet with perfect deviation and twist (deviation difference between high and low tones caused by pre/de-emphasis over the typical audio path) or actual packets transmitted by arbitrary stations anywhere on the planet? There's way too many variables to give you a simple answer to such a general questoin. Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows Mobile and Win32 Greg Clark wrote: > What's the "best" packet decoder out there? > > By "best", I mean the one that has the greatest ability to decode APRS > data packets. > > Can be stand-alone (like the D710) or separate unit (like Kantronics TNC) > > Is any one in particular considered the "gold standard" ? > > How do units like the new Kenwood HT, or small inexpensive ones like > the TT4/OT/TNC-X compare? > > -- Greg K7RKT > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at tapr.org > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >
- Previous message: [aprssig] "Best" packet decoder solution
- Next message: [aprssig] "Best" packet decoder solution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
