[aprssig] Snow, Back-feed, Shocking things
Greg D. ko6th_greg at hotmail.comTue Feb 9 04:06:32 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [aprssig] Snow, Back-feed, Shocking things
- Next message: [aprssig] Wow! Bob you stirred the pot now! (E power)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Not to keep the discussion going, but I haven't seen this morsel of input... I am told that a Transfer Switch also is constructed to prevent an arc-welded contact from keeping the circuit live. With standard circuit breakers (like the 100A "mains" breakers in a typical home panel), there is a small but non-zero chance that opening the breakers will not actually open the circuit due to a failed contact. There is pretty much no way to detect that this has occurred, until you've killed someone upstream. Greg KO6TH > From: k7ftp at k7ftp.net > To: aprssig at tapr.org > Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:14:28 -0700 > Subject: Re: [aprssig] Snow, Back-feed, Shocking things > > From: "Tom Mandera" <tsm1 at tmcom.com> > > How is a transfer switch significantly different from disconnecting the > > main breaker (which could have failed and be passing electricity even when > > off, but uncommon) before plugging on the backup power? > > A real transfer switch employs a BREAK BEFORE MAKE architecture. Either the > generator is connected to the circuit, nothing is connected to the circuit, > or the utility is connected to the circuit. Really a DPTT with a center off > position. > > A real transfer switch connects between the house circuit breaker panel and > the circuits that can be generator powered. When they are properly > installed, they guarantee that you can't backfeed the utility and > potentially cause problems (or death). > > Here is a link to an installation of a real transfer switch. > > http://www.empreputah.com/gentran.htm > > Personally, I believe that we have way too many laws and restrictions in > this country, but that there are things that are SMART to do. We shouldn't > legislate them, but our elected officials (and the appointed ones they > select) love to try to legislate away all stupidity and carelessness, and > they usually legislate away all of the freedom in the process. > > But like I said - there are things that are SMART to do. Electricians don't > use MALE plugs as power SOURCES because of the exposed contacts. FEMALE > receptacles are used for SOURCES because the contacts are protected - > reducing the likelihood of someone getting shocked. The setup that Bob has > created is acceptable as long as BOB is the one working with it and he > ALWAYS does it correctly. If he doesn't, or if someone else is working with > it, the likelihood of a problem is GREATLY increased. > > Let's compare this with the rules of firearm safety. > http://www.jeepgunner.com/gunsafety.htm > > TREAT EVERY FIREARM AS IF IT IS LOADED > > NEVER ALLOW THE MUZZLE TO POINT AT ANYTHING YOU ARE NOT WILLING TO DESTROY > > KEEP YOUR FINGER OFF OF THE TRIGGER UNTIL THE FIREARM IS POINTED AT A TARGET > YOU ARE PREPARED TO SHOOT > > If these rules are always followed, then the likelihood of injury or death > in the event of a malfunction is little or none. If any one of the rules is > ignored, the likelihood goes up. If two of the rules are ignored, they go > up more. It's the same with this situation. > > There is a more practical standpoint on this. When I lived in Oregon, the > local power utility would not start to work on the lines in an area if there > was any sign of a generator in operation until someone had verified that the > generator was incapable of being connected to a home - or that a transfer > switch of the type I linked to above was installed and being used. If they > found a setup like what Bob is using, they would not work on the lines in > that area until it was disconnected and the cable used was "safed". Bob > might have some very angry neighbors that are waiting for their power to be > restored when they find out that he is the one holding it up while he argues > with the utility company. While his setup might be safe as long as he is > the one that sets it up and he does everything right, there is enough > potential for issues that they would be within their abilities under local > laws and codes to demand that he disconnect it and keep it that way. > > Just as a telco can disconnect any phone line which has problem-causing > equipment attached, the power utility can do the same thing. > > In this case, there is a legal and affordable way to avoid the issue. I'd > recommend it. > > Jim - K7FTP > > > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at tapr.org > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469228/direct/01/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20100208/e6c838e5/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: [aprssig] Snow, Back-feed, Shocking things
- Next message: [aprssig] Wow! Bob you stirred the pot now! (E power)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
