[aprssig] Replacement for UI-View any one
Keith VE7GDH ve7gdh at rac.caFri Jan 22 23:11:55 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [aprssig] Replacement for UI-View any one
- Next message: [aprssig] Replacement for UI-View any one
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bob W9RXR wrote... > That's my concern, Keith. After some effort, I got UI-View and the > PMapServer to run under Vista. I haven't tried Windows 7 yet. I am > very concerned that future Windows versions will become incompatible > with UI-View and UI-View users will be forced to find something else. > What that "something else" is, I don't know. If some future version of Windows wasn't compatible with UI-View32 v2.03 the user would always have the option of installing an earlier version of Windows... e.g. XP SP3. The user could make a "slipstream" copy of the installation disk with all the updates up until the point in time where Microsoft stopped supporting it. I do realize that not everyone would be willing to do this, but it would be an option. I don't know when this "future version" of Windows would be released, but hopefully if it we did get to the point where the operating system wasn't compatible with the software, there would be a "replacement" available by them. To be honest, I'm just not worried about it. MS will be supporting Windows 7 for some years to come, and hopefully for a few more years after "Windows 8" or whatever they want to call it comes out, but I'll always have my copies of Windows XP, one of Vista gathering dust on the shelf and perhaps at some point in the future, a few copies of Windows 7, but not yet. It's enough time in the future that I really don't look that far ahead. In the meantime, we can use and benefit from UI-View. I seem to recall that it took something like roger G4IDE became a silent key for people to start asking on the UI-View support list "what are we going to replace UI-View with". Well, people are still asking that same question... and still using UI-View. > As for features, the only concern I have with UI-View is mapping. To > me, an APRS client that does not have pan and zoom maps based on > regularly-updated map data is not worth my time. Luckily, we have the > PMapServer. But, to my way of thinking, an APRS client should have > that capability built-in. My copies of PM 7 and PM will never "stop working" as will my copies of Windows XP. I know that "Windows Update" for XP will only be available for a certain amount of time, so to have a reasonably secure operating system, it would be worth my time learning how to "slipstream" all of the updates onto a copy of Windows XP. PMap 8 along with PMapServer gives me street level mapping of all of North America with pan and zoom. When I buy a radio, I don't think about what I'll replace it with later. I just use it and enjoy it and when it's finally worn out, or if one with new features that I really need is available, I'll get it. In the meantime I welcome and applaud anyone with the talent and dedication to develop a new APRS client. 73 es cul - Keith VE7GDH -- "I may be lost, but I know exactly where I am!"
- Previous message: [aprssig] Replacement for UI-View any one
- Next message: [aprssig] Replacement for UI-View any one
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
