[aprssig] SSID Standardization
Jim WU3V james at wu3v.netWed Jun 9 22:28:23 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [aprssig] SSID Standardization
- Next message: [aprssig] SSID Standardization
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Actually one byte duh! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim WU3V" <james at wu3v.net> To: "TAPR APRS Mailing List" <aprssig at tapr.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 22:12 Subject: Re: [aprssig] SSID Standardization > The ax.25 protocole had but one bit to assign to an ssid since it is a hex > numeral 0-9 and a-f thus 16 ssid'd > > Jim NH0E > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tim N9PUZ" <tim.n9puz at gmail.com> > To: <aprssig at tapr.org> > Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 22:09 > Subject: Re: [aprssig] SSID Standardization > > >>> Standardizing on SSIDs has its merits, but >>> the standards need to be very broad because >>> we only have 16 SSIDs available to us. >> >> Is there a licensing/legal or technical reason that there are only 16? >> Just curious. >> >> Tim, N9PUZ >> (N9PUZ-10 Winlink Gateway) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aprssig mailing list >> aprssig at tapr.org >> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >> > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at tapr.org > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >
- Previous message: [aprssig] SSID Standardization
- Next message: [aprssig] SSID Standardization
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
