[aprssig] SSID Standardization
Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr) ldeffenb at homeside.toWed Jun 9 23:07:32 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [aprssig] SSID Standardization
- Next message: [aprssig] SSID Standardization
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
From the AX.25 spec (all page numbers relative to the ax25.2.2.PDF): Page 19: 3.12 The SSID is a four-bit integer that uniquely identifies multiple stations using the same amateur callsign. Page 20: The SSID octet at the end of each address subfield (A7 and A14) contains the SSID and the “C” bit. The C bits identify command and response frames (see Section 6.1.2). The SSID octet at the end of each optional Layer 2 repeater address subfield (A21 and A28) contains the SSID and the “H” bit (“[H]as-been-repeated”). The H bits indicate that the Layer 2 repeater station has repeated the frame (see Section 3.12.3). Each SSID octet contains two bits that are reserved for future use. So, the SSID is an octet (byte) but is only allocated 4 bits (00-15) out of the 8 bits. 2 bits are reserved, one is the C and one is the H bit. Yes, the AX.25 header is the reason for the 00-15 "restriction" on APRS SSIDs. Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Going to the source... Rudy Benner wrote: > One BYTE gets you from zero to 255. > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Jim WU3V" <james at wu3v.net> > Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 6:28 PM > To: "TAPR APRS Mailing List" <aprssig at tapr.org> > Subject: Re: [aprssig] SSID Standardization > >> Actually one byte duh! >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim WU3V" <james at wu3v.net> >> To: "TAPR APRS Mailing List" <aprssig at tapr.org> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 22:12 >> Subject: Re: [aprssig] SSID Standardization >> >> >>> The ax.25 protocole had but one bit to assign to an ssid since it is >>> a hex >>> numeral 0-9 and a-f thus 16 ssid'd >>> >>> Jim NH0E >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim N9PUZ" <tim.n9puz at gmail.com> >>> To: <aprssig at tapr.org> >>> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 22:09 >>> Subject: Re: [aprssig] SSID Standardization >>> >>> >>>>> Standardizing on SSIDs has its merits, but >>>>> the standards need to be very broad because >>>>> we only have 16 SSIDs available to us. >>>> >>>> Is there a licensing/legal or technical reason that there are only 16? >>>> Just curious. >>>> >>>> Tim, N9PUZ >>>> (N9PUZ-10 Winlink Gateway) >>>>
- Previous message: [aprssig] SSID Standardization
- Next message: [aprssig] SSID Standardization
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
