[aprssig] SSID Standardization
Earl Needham earl.kd5xb at gmail.comThu Jun 10 18:11:46 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [aprssig] SSID Standardization
- Next message: [aprssig] SSID Standardization (final understanding)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Robert Bruninga <bruninga at usna.edu> wrote: > > I periodically get messages where somebody > > is trying to correct my use of -11 as > > my SSID in the 18-wheeler... > > Yes, that is a good question. 18 wheelers have been using -14 > for nearly 15 years. If you are an 18 wheeler and are proud of > it, then why not use the -14 that all the other professionals > are using.? It makes it easy to pick out the pros in the list > and try to make a QSO. > How do I take that? Are you saying that use of -11 instead of -14 makes me non-professional??? Seems to me that it should be pretty easy to figure out -- if it's moving, it's a car, unless it's going slower than about 75 or 80 MPH, then it's a truck. > > If you wish to go back to using SSIDs to set icons, > > then whatever happened to -9=car, -10=truck, etc??? > > I don't know where you have been, but just about everyone uses > -9 for their primary mobile and -7 for their HT. This has > nothing to do about ICONS. It is choosing an SSID CALLSIGN that > gives some recognition to that callsign-SSID combination when it > appears in lists. > > What I was trying to point out is that we HAD a standard, and it's been discarded. Earl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20100610/a1504af0/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: [aprssig] SSID Standardization
- Next message: [aprssig] SSID Standardization (final understanding)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
