[aprssig] Hmmm... (slightly OT)

[Steve Noskowicz]

For Part 15 (which the ZigBee modules are) the antenna is part of the certification, so only sertain antennas are legal in the ISM bands.  I'm pretty sure ZigBees can NOT be moved to the 2.4 GHz ham band.


--
73, Steve, K9DCI USN (Vet) MOT (Ret) Ham (Yet)
 

--- On Tue, 11/9/10, Rudy Benner <benner at vianet.ca> wrote:


From: Rudy Benner <benner at vianet.ca>
Subject: Re: [aprssig] Hmmm... (slightly OT)
To: "TAPR APRS Mailing List" <aprssig at tapr.org>
Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2010, 10:38 PM







Exactly! I could have used this last field day.
 
http://www.dealextreme.com/search.dx/search.wifly-city
 
VE3BDR


 

From: Greg D. 
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 11:17 PM
To: aprssig at tapr.org 
Subject: [aprssig] Hmmm... (slightly OT)
 
Saw this on the Web...  http://www.dealextreme.com/search.dx/search.wifly-city

Two points, I guess:

1.  I wonder if the FCC would be interested in these?  Note the power levels (2W is illegal in the U.S., no?)

2.  For HAM use, could be the basis for a nice digital backbone, especially when paired with a yagi or panel.

Greg  KO6TH




_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
aprssig at tapr.org
https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig




No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1153 / Virus Database: 424/3247 - Release Date: 11/09/10
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----


_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
aprssig at tapr.org
https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20101110/807843f3/attachment.htm>