[aprssig] Ultimate APRS digi
Wes Johnston, AI4PX wes at ai4px.comFri Nov 19 18:23:18 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [aprssig] Ultimate APRS digi
- Next message: [aprssig] Ultimate APRS digi
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'm not sure you understand. If you are away from an alt input digi, use 144.39 simplex. if you are in range of an alt input digi, use 144.39+600. You could have two profiles stored in your kenwood, or you could have two memories programmed into your radio. No need to constantly QSY. Wes --- God help those who do not help themselves. On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 13:18, Bob Poortinga <aprssig at k9sql.us> wrote: > Robert Bruninga <bruninga at usna.edu> writes: > > > But by splitting all user inputs to alternate channels, the > > 144.39 can have 5 to 10 times the capacity is has now. > > There is a fundamental flaw in this proposal. You can > never here a station directly. If you are in area with no > digipeater coverage, you will hear nothing on 144.39. > No one will want to be constantly switching receive > frequencies. > > 73 de > -- > Bob Poortinga K9SQL > Bloomington, IN US > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at tapr.org > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20101119/9826c2e0/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: [aprssig] Ultimate APRS digi
- Next message: [aprssig] Ultimate APRS digi
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
