[aprssig] Ultimate APRS digi
Bill V WA7NWP wa7nwp at gmail.comFri Nov 19 21:40:00 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [aprssig] Ultimate APRS digi
- Next message: [aprssig] Ultimate APRS digi
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>> But by splitting all user inputs to alternate >>> channels, the 144.39 can have 5 to 10 times >>> the capacity is has now. >> >> There is a fundamental flaw in this proposal. >> You can never hear a station directly. If >> you are in area with no digipeater coverage, >> you will hear nothing on 144.39. > > I think maybe you missed something: > 1) Everything on every alternate input is digipeated over to > 144.39 This scheme helps but it doesn't scale. I think the 5x to 10x is overly optimistic. For the few that actually do this change in transmit frequency -- it might take the 144.39 channel from very overloaded back to just overloaded. Then a few more users show up and we're back to very overloaded. Expecting to see all traffic locally in a busy area is probably asking more than a collision hindered 1200 baud channel can provide. Using an 9k6 flood of all traffic in the area and multiple 1200 input channels may be more workable. 73 Bill - WA7NWP
- Previous message: [aprssig] Ultimate APRS digi
- Next message: [aprssig] Ultimate APRS digi
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
