[aprssig] THOUGHTS ON RELIEVING APRS CONGESTION ON 144.39
Bob Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduSat Nov 20 13:32:15 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [aprssig] THOUGHTS ON RELIEVING APRS CONGESTION ON 144.39
- Next message: [aprssig] THOUGHTS ON RELIEVING APRS CONGESTION ON 144.39
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> In East Tennessee, we found that our problem > was too many packets from outside of the area. > Here's ... how we addressed this situation... [limit wide area mountain top digis to 1 hop] Yes! You nailed it. And because of your reminder, I'm going back to my aprs.org diagram and change it to only support one-hop on all inputs. That is what I was thinking, but for simplicity I put down WIDEn-N. Ill change that to WIDE1-1 or WIDE2-2. Afterall, if this is at a super site, worth all the effort to add alternate inputs, then it certainly covers a wide area... Bob, WB4APR > The digi's in East Tennessee typically have a > HUGE coverage area because of our mountainous > terrain. Without restricting what they digi on, > we frequently see packets from hundreds of > miles away (i.e. from Florida, Arkansas, Ohio, > Missouri, etc.) in our area. These packets are > needless and reduce the reliability of the > local area packets. > > The ... Kantronics KPC3+ [are] configured: > > UIDIGI ON TN,WIDE1-1,WIDE2-2 > UITRACE TN,30 > UIFLOOD TEMP,30,ID > > This... provides one or two hops to any station > in the area using recommended paths. We have > found that this is enough to facilitate local > situational awareness, getting local traffic > into an iGate and local messaging. > > We do not digi on WIDE2-1; that is generally > used in conjunction with WIDE1-1 as in > WIDE1-1,WIDE2-1. We digi on WIDE1-1, then let > the WIDE2-1 die or possibly be picked up by > a digi outside of the area. > > ... in our area with our very wide area digis > a single hop is sufficient for 90%+ of the > day-to-day traffic and limiting in such a way > has improved the efficiency of our local network. > > We also...[can use] TNn-N if we need wider > coverage and support TN to take advantage > of some older TNCs in the area which we have > not been able to get updated to the new > WIDEn-N paradigm. > > ... it works very well and has dramatically > reduced the number of out-of-state packets > we hear in our area and has greatly improved > the reliability of our local network. > William McKeehan > KI4HDU > http://mckeehan.homeip.net
- Previous message: [aprssig] THOUGHTS ON RELIEVING APRS CONGESTION ON 144.39
- Next message: [aprssig] THOUGHTS ON RELIEVING APRS CONGESTION ON 144.39
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
