[aprssig] THOUGHTS ON RELIEVING APRS CONGESTION ON 144.39
William McKeehan mckeehan at mckeehan.homeip.netSun Nov 21 21:52:51 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [aprssig] THOUGHTS ON RELIEVING APRS CONGESTION ON 144.39
- Next message: [aprssig] THOUGHTS ON RELIEVING APRS CONGESTION ON 144.39
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I have three recommendations. 1. if the fixed station is one where an operator is monitoring it regularly, I recommend using a specific digi's callsign, so one hop via a single digi. 2. the next option is to use a path of TN 3. the final suggestion is to use a path of WIDE1-1,WIDE2-1 (which was the recommended path at the time that we originally developed these guidelines) More details can be seen here: http://mckeehan.homeip.net/wiki/wikka.php?wakka=EastTNAPRS -- William McKeehan KI4HDU http://mckeehan.homeip.net On Sat, November 20, 2010 1:41 pm, Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr) wrote: > William McKeehan wrote: >> We do not digi on WIDE2-1; that is generally used in conjunction with >> WIDE1-1 as in WIDE1-1,WIDE2-1. We digi on WIDE1-1, then let the WIDE2-1 die >> or >> possibly be picked up by a digi outside of the area. >> > > What do you recommend for local fixed stations that are running on low > antennas and/or power? WIDE2-2? or WIDE1-1? The nationwide > recommendation (I think) is WIDE2-1, but that won't get digi'd at all in > your environment. > > Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows Mobile and Win32 > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at tapr.org > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > >
- Previous message: [aprssig] THOUGHTS ON RELIEVING APRS CONGESTION ON 144.39
- Next message: [aprssig] THOUGHTS ON RELIEVING APRS CONGESTION ON 144.39
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
