[aprssig] Digital repeater Objects
Steve Noskowicz noskosteve at yahoo.comThu Oct 28 01:25:59 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [aprssig] Digital repeater Objects
- Next message: [aprssig] Digital repeater Objects
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Oh yea! Duh! ... But those with frequency do risk a world-wide collision, right? Therefore freq for a name ain't such a good idea after all. I was thinking of the user seeing the freq on the display...like on your locakl info page... re-think time. Thanks -- 73, Steve, K9DCI USN (Vet) MOT (Ret) Ham (Yet) --- On Wed, 10/27/10, Robert Bruninga <bruninga at usna.edu> wrote: > From: Robert Bruninga <bruninga at usna.edu> > Subject: Re: [aprssig] Digital repeater Objects > To: "'TAPR APRS Mailing List'" <aprssig at tapr.org> > Date: Wednesday, October 27, 2010, 5:46 PM > > I speculated as follows > > 444.025+P = P25 > > 444.025+? = ? > > 444.025+D = D-Star or DMR Or perhaps 444.025+M = > dMr > > A frequency object should be chosen so that its object name > is > worldwide unique if you want to see it on the > APRS-IS. Thus you > cannot standardize on the "xyz" bytes in the "FFF.Ffxyz" > byte > object name field. > > Just choose something unique. Check the APRS-IS to > see what > other repeaters on your freq are using... > > Bob, Wb4APR > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at tapr.org > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >
- Previous message: [aprssig] Digital repeater Objects
- Next message: [aprssig] Digital repeater Objects
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
