[aprssig] APRS -- Automatic PACKET vs POSITION Reporting System
Earl Needham earl.kd5xb at gmail.comFri Sep 3 00:54:11 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS -- Automatic PACKET vs POSITION Reporting System
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS -- Automatic PACKET vs POSITION Reporting System
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Read my 2 posts on this subject again. Read them carefully. Now decide if you want to contact the VEC to let them know they have a question where the answer doesn't agree with your impression or your carefully researched conclusion. Earl KD5XB -- Earl Needham http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cw_bugs Quoting from the Coast Guard: ZUT Posted via Blackberry -----Original Message----- From: KA8VIT <ka8vit at ka8vit.com> Sender: aprssig-bounces at tapr.org Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:44:50 To: TAPR APRS Mailing List<aprssig at tapr.org> Reply-To: TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org> Subject: Re: [aprssig] APRS -- Automatic PACKET vs POSITION Reporting System _______________________________________________ aprssig mailing list aprssig at tapr.org https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS -- Automatic PACKET vs POSITION Reporting System
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS -- Automatic PACKET vs POSITION Reporting System
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
