[aprssig] APRS -- Automatic PACKET vs POSITION Reporting System
Charles Doughtie n5exy at yahoo.comFri Sep 3 00:54:25 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS -- Automatic PACKET vs POSITION Reporting System
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS -- Automatic PACKET vs POSITION Reporting System
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bob has been strangely silent - yep, it is his call. "Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors... and miss." Robert A. Heinlein --- On Thu, 9/2/10, KA8VIT <ka8vit at ka8vit.com> wrote: From: KA8VIT <ka8vit at ka8vit.com> Subject: Re: [aprssig] APRS -- Automatic PACKET vs POSITION Reporting System To: "TAPR APRS Mailing List" <aprssig at tapr.org> Date: Thursday, September 2, 2010, 7:44 PM Ask Bob, it's his baby ! 73 - Bill KA8VIT Earl Needham wrote: It's always been POSITION to me but I understand some documents say POSITION & some say PACKET. I'd suggest an in-depth study of all the docs before bothering the VEC. -- Bill Chaikin, KA8VIT USS COD Amateur Radio Club - W8COD WW2 Submarine USS COD SS-224 (NECO) ka8vit at ka8vit.com http://ka8vit.com http://www.usscod.org -----Inline Attachment Follows----- _______________________________________________ aprssig mailing list aprssig at tapr.org https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20100902/8c73ad4e/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS -- Automatic PACKET vs POSITION Reporting System
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS -- Automatic PACKET vs POSITION Reporting System
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
