[aprssig] ARPS physical layer
Scott Miller scott at opentrac.orgThu Sep 16 20:41:07 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [aprssig] ARPS physical layer
- Next message: [aprssig] ARPS physical layer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I discovered early in the development of the OpenTracker that a long string of 7E flags just doesn't do a good job of syncing the receiver. My decode rate drastically improved when I switched to 0's. There are some other audible differences, too. Some of the TNCs use V.23 instead of Bell 202 which has the tones 100 Hz closer to the center, I think. Also, I think there's a difference between the digitally synthesized tones (specifically in the transition between tones) used by things like the OpenTracker and TinyTrak and purely hardware-based modems like in the KPC-3. (Another trip to the desert and another missed rendezvous, Phil - maybe *next* summer we'll have a chance to sit down and have a beer. =]) Scott N1VG On 9/16/2010 7:26 AM, Phil N6TCT wrote: > Nice! I've always wondered why, by ear, the preambles of packets from > some TNCs sound different than those from other TNCs! > > Phil > > John Hansen wrote: >> [...] The bytes you have before the address are the 7E flags. In >> addition, you'll find that many TNC's idle during the TXDelay period >> using 00's instead of 7E's. > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at tapr.org > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > >
- Previous message: [aprssig] ARPS physical layer
- Next message: [aprssig] ARPS physical layer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
