Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)
ldeffenb at homeside.to
Tue Mar 15 19:08:24 CDT 2011
I think the suggestion is for RF stations to put ISONLY in their path to
prevent RF propagation (digipeating) by theoretically intelligent
stations that "know" that the packet has been delivered to APRS-IS.
However, IMHO APRS is about Local knowledge and propagation and the
APRS-IS is simply a nice way to provide global glimpses into that local
information. And this from the author of what started out as an
APRS-IS-only client application....
Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows Mobile and Win32
On 3/15/2011 6:51 PM, Keith VE7GDH wrote:
> Bill WA7NWP wrote...
>> the APRS-IS. Why not also have something like "ISONLY" for
>> folks that only care about being seen on the web services?... This
>> could potentially reduce lots of extraneous packets on RF.
> Hmmm... I don't see the point. IGates don't just gate "stuff" to RF just
> because it exists. They would specifically have to set something to
> gate anything to RF. The usual would be to gate just messages to
> "local" stations. If the "TCPIP only" station hadn't been on RF, the
> IGate wouldn't gate any messages directed to that station to RF.
> If they were gating more than messages to local stations, then it is
> something that they would have specifically set up, and hopefully not
> in a way to saturate the local RF network.
> 73 es cul - Keith VE7GDH
> "I may be lost, but I know exactly where I am!"
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
More information about the aprssig