[aprssig] APRS Radiation sensor
Guido Trentalancia iz6rdb at trentalancia.comTue Mar 22 23:06:18 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS Radiation sensor
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS Radiation sensor
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Bob, glad we finally get this working ! The bottom of the scale (2 nSv/h) is probably undetectable. The top of the scale should be fine up to Level 7 of Internation Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (IAEA) *outside* of a reactor (Chernobyl core was up to 300Sv/h immediately after the 1986 accident). If anyone has some sort of "clever" software then an automatic alert (APRS bulletins, email, SMS) could be triggered for the Level 2 range (steadily above 0.1 mSv/h). 73, Guido IZ6RDB On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 15:27 -0400, Bob Bruninga wrote: > How about this for Radiation Telemetry: > > - 3 digits. Either in a WX report or in a Telemetry channel. > - In a weather report the identifying byte would be "X". > - So X123 would be 12 times 10^3rd nanoseverts > > Using Tapio's idea (below) of 2 digits of precision and one digit of decade. > > Bob, WB4APR > > -----Original Message----- > From: aprssig-bounces at tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces at tapr.org] On Behalf > Of Tapio Sokura > Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:40 PM > To: TAPR APRS Mailing List > Subject: Re: [aprssig] Clarification of APRS weather station data flow. > > Hi, > > On 03/17/2011 05:29 AM, Scott Miller wrote: > > Also, unsurprisingly, there's been a big surge of interest in Geiger > > counter interfacing. Bob, can we get a standard for sending ionizing > > radiation levels in weather reports? > > I'm not Bob, but I'm sticking my spoon into the soup anyway after a > little IRC chatting.. so here goes: Anyone who's familiar with radiation > levels knows they can hugely vary in scale. So using a plain, say > three-digit, number isn't going to scale very well (i.e. 001 = 1 uSv/h, > 999 = 999 uSv/h). > > I'm suggesting the following: three digits, where the first two are the > significant digits (mantissa) and the last one is an exponent. Base unit > could be nSv/h, nanosieverts per hour (Sievert is the SI-unit for > ionizing radiation dose equivalent). > > If abc represents the digits, the resulting radiation level would be > calculated using the formula ab * 10^c nSv/h. A few examples: > > 000 = special case for "reading unavailable" > 010 = special (theoretical) case of 1 nSv/h or under > 020 = 2 nSv/h > 150 = 15 nSv/h > 990 = 99 nSv/h > 321 = 320 nSv/h > 123 = 12 uSv/h > 654 = 650 uSv/h > 456 = 45 mSv/h > 987 = 980 mSv/h > 989 = 98 Sv/h > 999 = special case for 99 Sv/h or over > > So that's the digit part sorted out, now we just need a letter > identifier/tag for it.. > > Tapio > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at tapr.org > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS Radiation sensor
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS Radiation sensor
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
