[aprssig] aprs Radiation Senser
Guido Trentalancia iz6rdb at trentalancia.comFri Mar 25 20:16:07 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [aprssig] aprs Radiation Senser
- Next message: [aprssig] aprs Radiation Senser
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Jim ! I didn't know anything about that. Thanks for telling me ! 73, Guido IZ6RDB On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 12:55 -0700, Jim Wagner wrote: > On Mar 25, 2011, at 5:00 AM, aprssig-request at tapr.org wrote: > > Contrary go Guido's assertion, below, there have been quite a few > deaths from panic in the US, particularly from fire. > > Simply look up "Copacabana Fire" and you will see what happens. For > that matter, check out Orson Well's "War of the Worlds" radio show in > 1938. That was a panic over a mere radio play; it is NOT clear that > there were any deaths attributed. > > Now, clearly, these were NOT the same a a radiation panic. But, the > "War of the Worlds" shows just how susceptible people are, and I do > not think they have changed much in the last 50+ years. > > Jim Wagner > KA7EHK > Tangent, Or > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Message: 1 > > Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:20:45 +0100 > > From: Guido Trentalancia <iz6rdb at trentalancia.com> > > Subject: Re: [aprssig] APRS Radiation sensor > > To: jjesson at voyager.net, TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org> > > Message-ID: <1300969245.4904.16.camel at tesla.lan> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > > > On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 05:03 +0000, jjesson at voyager.net wrote: > >> Here is another good reason to own a geiger counter and not sure > >> what happened since 2008: > >> > >> http://dwarmstr.blogspot.com/2008/01/new-york-wants-to-ban-geiger-counters.html > > > > Yes, panic is the only side-effect of having such a monitoring > > network. > > But panic has never killed anyone, panic is something which usually > > can > > only saves lives. > > > > If the driver in front of you suddenly brakes, you get panic and you > > also brake suddenly and perhaps an accident is prevented. Without > > panic, > > perhaps that situation would result in an accident. > > > > Or at least this is my opinion... > > > > In case of an anomalous situation it is always better to cross-check > > with authorities (or at least with other sources). In any case, where > > possible a disclaimer should be printed out (e.g. station's website, > > perhaps APRS comment field and so on). > > > > I suppose it's a very similar situation to CWOP/NWS. There isn't a > > paid > > staff behind CWOP and everything is done as a best effort. But this > > doesn't necessarily mean that CWOP could not turn out to be useful. > > > > 73, > > > > Guido IZ6RDB > > > > End of aprssig Digest, Vol 81, Issue 30 > > *************************************** > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at tapr.org > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >
- Previous message: [aprssig] aprs Radiation Senser
- Next message: [aprssig] aprs Radiation Senser
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
