[aprssig] Auto-Answer meets Auto-Responder (AVRS)
Keith VE7GDH ve7gdh at rac.caWed Nov 2 19:14:54 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [aprssig] Auto-Answer meets Auto-Responder (AVRS)
- Next message: [aprssig] AUTO-ANSWER SPEC [AA]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bob WB4APR wrote... > Yes, APRS requires that they begin any AutoAnswer with [AA]. > > At least that is what the original APRS required and was agreed by the > earlier authors. Not sure it got into the formal spec. I just sent a message to a D7. I received a regular ACK and then received an "auto answer" in the form of... "RCVD 73 de RANDY TH D7A". I followed this up with another message and received the same "auto answer" again... in other words, no [AA]. I was watching on RF and looked at the raw data at aprs.fi as well. I'll speak to my friend and suggest that he manually enters [AA] ahead of his auto answer. Even though some clients comply with the [AA] I still think that "auto answers" are of limited value, unless they convey useful information. In the case of the message that I sent to my friend, a simple ACK with have done the job. 73 es cul - Keith VE7GDH -- "I may be lost, but I know exactly where I am!"
- Previous message: [aprssig] Auto-Answer meets Auto-Responder (AVRS)
- Next message: [aprssig] AUTO-ANSWER SPEC [AA]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
