[aprssig] Reply-Ack Spec vs }AA

[Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)]

I'll claim some responsibility for that and extend my public apologies.  
On re-reading my earlier response, it DID sound like I was taking the 
discussion to a personal level, especially when taken in conjunction 
with some earlier posts by me on the AA: topic.

It is NOT my intention to criticize any personalities, nor persons in 
any of my posts, and Bob, you have my sincerest apology that my post did 
sound like it was.  Please accept that apology and we can get back to 
the business of improving my (and other's as well) understanding of all 
that has gone before as well as extending that prior art to accommodate 
new ideas.

Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows Mobile and Win32

On 11/6/2011 1:40 PM, Jim Alles wrote:
> Bob,
> I will be emailing you privately.
> From my personal experience, this forum is not the place for personal 
> criticsm.
> Jim Alles KB3TBX
>
>     I wish that didn't sound so much like an attack or a complaint.  I
>     try very *very* hard to document EVERY aspect and nuance of APRS
>     whenever something comes up that was not clear, or was omitted
>     from the original spec.  These last few things you have complained
>     about were both attempts on my part to document these nuances.  It
>     seems unfair to complain about undocumented nuances and then
>     complain when we attempt to fix the documentation to accomodate it.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20111106/68be6415/attachment.htm>