[aprssig] Satellite positions: Objects or Stations?
Bob Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduSat Oct 15 13:00:51 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [aprssig] Satellite positions: Objects or Stations?
- Next message: [aprssig] Satellite positions: Objects or Stations?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In your generated ISS Position from the ISS callsign, of course, you will have to add a note on he end in the comment field to the effect "de KJ4ERJ" of course. Bob, WB4APR ---- Original message ---- >Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 21:26:44 -0400 >From: aprssig-bounces at tapr.org (on behalf of "Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)" <ldeffenb at homeside.to>) >Subject: [aprssig] Satellite positions: Objects or Stations? >To: TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org> > >On 10/14/2011 9:14 PM, Bob Bruninga wrote: >> >> TO avoid the problem even in UIview, it wouild be nice if you originated the >> object on the APRS-IS as if it was a station by the satellite's name. But >> this station's position should only be the LIVE-NOW posit. We cannot have >> past, present and future positions all over the globe... > >Ok, before I change the ISS from an object to a station, and possibly >start beaconing live positions for any queried satellites, I'd like to >get a consensus from the aprssig. I made the ISS satellite an object >sourced by KJ4ERJ-15 to provide for trackability and to adhere to the >established norms (as I saw them, at least) that stations were "real" >and objects were "manufactured". Yes, they may be designed to be >displayed the same, but there was some resistance to making RFID-implied >locations "stations" rather than "objects" as it was somehow deemed >"spoofing" something that wasn't really APRS. > >Yes, these are satellites and not representative of potentially real >individuals, but before I write code that is less traceable as to the >source of the posits, I'd like to be able to point back to a consensus >of individuals (call it "group-think"?) rather than a unilateral >decision that may come back to haunt me two days/weeks/years after I put >in operation. > >So, Satellite Objects? Or Source-Calls / Stations? Weigh in with your >opinion on the list or off and I'll see where the consensus lies in a >few days' time. > >Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows Mobile and Win32 > >PS. The positions being beaconed will be LIVE and the descriptions will >be generic, not location specific. If you want AOS/LOS information, >either send a message to the satellite (see earlier thread about ISS >Tracking & Pass Information) or look it up elsewhere. > >Oh, but the posits will have a MultiLine encoding >(http://www.aprs-is.net/WX/MultilineProtocol.aspx) of their approximate >coverage area so that clients that support such displays will be able to >see it. This will appear as random characters on non-supporting >clients, unfortunately. > > > >_______________________________________________ >aprssig mailing list >aprssig at tapr.org >https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
- Previous message: [aprssig] Satellite positions: Objects or Stations?
- Next message: [aprssig] Satellite positions: Objects or Stations?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
