[aprssig] Satellite Predictions requires a) Beacon and b) Messaging IGate
Steve Noskowicz noskosteve at yahoo.comTue Oct 18 20:24:56 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [aprssig] Satellite Predictions requires a) Beacon and b) Messaging IGate
- Next message: [aprssig] Satellite Predictions requires a) Beacon and b) Messaging IGate
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I haven't been able to read all the remarks (Mac Hard Drive crash & Recovery under way - 95% back now) but... As a potentially ignorant future user of this service: 6:45m and 6.75m are both are kinda' stuck to a wicket. (;-). IS 6:45m 6 hours and 45 minutes? Could be confusing if unknown up front. Then 6.45m while "consistent" has to be mentally translated. Yes, this is not a disaster, but unconventional in the normal timekeeping paradigm. Then I wondered if 6m45 would be better...seems to be. It seems to be saying "6 minutes, 45 [seconds implied] ". That seems to have some basis for being easily deciphered. I understand the bit about there being so many sats that asking for an estimate of the next few to AOS in my location sounds like a larger programming issue since they all have to be calculated rather then just the one I requested. Finally, I have to ask that the goal of this service needs to be chewed on if not done in the posts I haven't read. @ first, I was thinking this is useful only for Digi sats. This for someone in a remote location trying to get email out (EMAIL or WinLink). Then I thought, well, an FM sat would also be a good way to "get out", FM sats and those with either mobile or HT capability. Any way, things like this need to be defined ... the requirements. (spoken like a true retired Engineering Manager. (;-). If it is for a seldom (and therefore ignorant of all the detail) user, things must be "obvious", or "intuitive" - whatever that means. Also, the "useable part" of the pass is going to be a large variable, so quantifying it for a given user very difficult. If economy of characters is important, then I think MaxEL could be shortened to simply EL, no? I have done VERY little sat work, but still know the max EL is important, so if it just says EL, I *get* it. 73, Steve, K9DCI --- Bob Bruninga wrote: >... I'm still a little uncomfortable with the time formats: > > AOS in 6:45h for 9:50m MaxEL 27 > ... So that is kinda unusual to see... > > 2) No mobile is ever going to see a 9:50 minute pass. >... I'd really like to see that rounded to "9m" > > Although I do not feel comfortable with 6:45h I am less > comfortable with > "6.75h" but is more consistent. If you want to mix > minutes and seconds you > could use 6h 45m. Though I don't like that > either. As you know, I like > indicating it as a specific TIME if it is more than an hour > away or in delta > minutes of it is less than an hour. > > > > AOS in 37m for 9m MaxEL 27 (or) > > AOS at 1425z for 9m MaxEL 27 (or) > > Actually, I would make the separation be at 99 > minutes. This is because > all LEO satellites have periods on the order of 90 to 100 > minutes, so if it > is less than 100 minutes away, then it is the next > pass. If it is more than > 99 m inutes away, then it is quite a while. >
- Previous message: [aprssig] Satellite Predictions requires a) Beacon and b) Messaging IGate
- Next message: [aprssig] Satellite Predictions requires a) Beacon and b) Messaging IGate
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
