[aprssig] Satellite positions: FREQUENCY
Bill Vodall wa7nwp at gmail.comWed Oct 19 23:30:13 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [aprssig] Satellite positions: FREQUENCY
- Next message: [aprssig] Satellite positions: FREQUENCY
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> >> callsign data > > Send a callsign to WHO-IS. If you prefix it with f<space>, you'll get > "full" information. That's cool but it doesn't build a local database of local users... And as you've mentioned before - even a simple name like that is hard to remember if it's not used regularly. >> keps > > I haven't figured out how to compress them sufficiently to fit within a > single APRS message See APRSDOS from the old old days. Bob had that. >> icons, > > In what format? xastir uses one thing, UI-View another, APRSISCE/32 a > third, and who knows WHAT the iSomethins and 'droids are using. And can you > imagine the look of everyone's maps come April 1st? Yes. Yes and Yes. Which doesn't mean we shouldn't be doing it. >> software updates > > 1-2 MByte over a 1200baud shared channel? No thanks! You haven't lived until you FTP'ed a 3+ MB .mp3 on 1200 baud packet! >> . We have the bandwidth and should be using it. > > We are. Just tune over to 144.390 in any APRS-busy area and give a listen. > And to hear Bob say it, 20% loading is a good plan for a shared access > channel or throughput actually begins to drop. Actually 18% but 20% is a nice round number. We have many packet channels that are under used and even 144.39 in most areas would be beneath that magic 20% figure. > Bill
- Previous message: [aprssig] Satellite positions: FREQUENCY
- Next message: [aprssig] Satellite positions: FREQUENCY
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
