[aprssig] OT: FRS & Type Acceptance WAS: Clubs, FRS ...teams
aprssig at k7ftp.net aprssig at k7ftp.netSun Sep 4 20:03:20 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [aprssig] OT: FRS & Type Acceptance WAS: Clubs, FRS ...teams
- Next message: [aprssig] OT: FRS & Type Acceptance WAS: Clubs, FRS ...teams
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Earl, Not to get into an argument with you, but back in the day of 14.4K and slower dialup speeds, there were sometimes more, shall we say, enthusiastic hall monitors that would immediately quash anything OT because messages could take a while to download. Today, we live in an era of T1 and faster Internet connection speeds. All of the messages in this list can be downloaded in less than a second. Therefore, we don't need the aggressive hall monitoring - other than to keep people from having to read messages that they might not really care about. For those folks, a second or two of brain processing (to determine that the message isn't of interest to them) and then less than 1 second to hit the DEL key is all that's required. If someone is too lazy to do that, then a blacklist would be appropriate, but more in the reverse direction. Part of the problem that was being discussed are some HAM's that get overly aggressive in interpreting and bringing attention to the rules and laws. Just like some people are extremely energetic in objecting to topics that are not of interest to them. In relevance to the topic, I don't think that Radio Shack and Pryme speaker-mics which conform to the Icom standard interface are type-accepted to be used with FRS radios. I don't think they really have to be. Likewise, I don't think that Bob hooking up a long speaker wire to the speaker output jack on his FRS radio is a violation. Sure, if someone really cares enough to go to the FCC for a ruling on it, and draw attention to it, they can. Just like they can complain all day long about messages on a topic that many of us did find interesting. Sorry to have offended you. -----Original Message----- From: aprssig-bounces at tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces at tapr.org] On Behalf Of Earl Needham Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2011 6:49 AM To: TAPR APRS Mailing List Subject: Re: [aprssig] OT: FRS & Type Acceptance WAS: Clubs, FRS ...teams My DELETE key is worn out! However, I also have a black list available. Perhaps I can put the offending parties in there -- along with people who suggest OFF TOPIC discussions are just fine and if you don't like them, you should use your delete key! LOL! 7 3 Earl KD5XB KD5XB -- Earl Needham http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cw_bugs Quoting from the Coast Guard: ZUT Posted via Blackberry -----Original Message----- From: <aprssig at k7ftp.net> Sender: aprssig-bounces at tapr.org Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 05:33:48 To: 'TAPR APRS Mailing List'<aprssig at tapr.org> Reply-To: TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org> Subject: Re: [aprssig] OT: FRS & Type Acceptance WAS: Clubs, FRS ...teams _______________________________________________ aprssig mailing list aprssig at tapr.org https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig _______________________________________________ aprssig mailing list aprssig at tapr.org https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
- Previous message: [aprssig] OT: FRS & Type Acceptance WAS: Clubs, FRS ...teams
- Next message: [aprssig] OT: FRS & Type Acceptance WAS: Clubs, FRS ...teams
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
