[aprssig] APRS vs. SPOT
Jim Alles kb3tbx at gmail.comThu Sep 8 13:18:16 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS vs. SPOT
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS vs. SPOT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iridium just announced Wifi from their satellites, good for an Igate app, maybe ($$$). Axcess Point<http://news.cnet.com/8301-30686_3-20102904-266/iridium-brings-wi-fi-to-remote-corners-of-the-world/> Jim A. KB3TBX On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:35 PM, <jjesson at voyager.net> wrote: > > From my ~10 years of designing-in commercial satellite/cellular tracking > and telematics systems: > > SPOT technology originally was designed by Axonn's then CTO and this > technology is based on simplex protocol talking to Globalstar.... protocol > is interesting as it chips between Globalstar's native CDMA duplex protocol > (native to Globalstar). Their form of simplex is also known as send-and-pray > as not an ARQ protocol with Simplex... but a form of repeat packet > transmissions improve the odds of correctly receiving packets and this is a > setting in their engineering configuration tool. > > Unfortunately, the fade margin (C/N) is marginal so trees or roof structure > attenuate the signal to the point of not working and the lack of > confirmation was a major issue. Not exactly the product or wireless > satellite protocol I would use if my life was riding on packet reception but > ok for a lightweight tracking unit. I used these for a quick light fleet > tracking system. > > The new Iridium ASIC provides a true duplex portable unit and offers a > solid ARQ protocol. I have evaluated their ASIC and it works great and would > be my life-saving product of choice. Hey, all the ice road truckers use > Iridium tracking devices and they do bet their life on this satellite > network! One word of caution - Iridium data costs are not for the typical > experimenter but if needed commercially a good deal if you need very > low-latency duplex data transmission. > > Incidentally, for the best cost/packet and if you can live with a longer > latency and larger antennas - such as for heavy equipment and 53' trailer > fleets - you cannot beat Orbcomm. While both Globalstar and Iridium use > L-band, Orbcomm uses 136-150 MHz for its operation. Now you understand the > antenna size issue :-) Orbcomm is getting ready to relaunch this year and > they will, IMHO, become the leader for global large asset tracking. > > 73, Joe Jesson, KC2VGL > > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at tapr.org > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20110908/12e5a9d5/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS vs. SPOT
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS vs. SPOT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
