[aprssig] Excessive beacons/connects by "smart" IS clients
Georg Lukas georg at op-co.deMon Apr 16 07:32:00 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [aprssig] Excessive beacons/connects by "smart" IS clients
- Next message: [aprssig] N666BK-1 no legal call what so ever...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Gerhard, * Gerhard.F5VAG <f5vag.eu at gmail.com> [2012-04-15 20:14]: > The various APRS-IS servers are exposed to an increasing number of > mobile TCP/IP clients which tend to send at beacon rates exceeding > reasonable limits. This issue will rapidly increase with the increasing > number of "smart" portable devices. I am really sorry for that misbehavior of APRSdroid. From my analysis, there are currently two issues in the application causing bad behavior on APRS: 1. the combination of SmartBeaconing and "wandering" GPS. When the device has a really bad GPS fix, with the position moving around, SmartBeaconing corner-pegging is triggered too often, sending position packets at minimum intervals. I am working on a solution for this. 2. (the problem you have observed) the APRSdroid service is killed by the Android system due to low memory, then automatically restarted after some seconds. Unfortunately, this means that APRSdroid has to reconnect to the server, and can not "remember" its internal state, including when it last sent a position report. This causes it to re-send a new beacon right after connecting. I will see how I can permanently store the last position to prevent flooding the medium. Unfortunately, I can not do any more to prevent the application from being killed by the OS. > However, seen from the server to which the client is connected, the observation > is much worse. In certain cases the server has to handle connect/disconnect > cycles below ten seconds over considerable time periods: > http://f5vag.eu/tmp/JavServUser_FNaaa-9.html This is anything but intended behavior. APRSdroid normally connects to a server, and keeps the connection as long as it is running and has a network connection. When the network connection is interrupted, it tries to reconnect in 30-second intervals, which I hope is OK from a server operator PoV. Also, after reconnecting it does _not_ automatically send a new position report. > In my view it is not reasonable to sent beacons with an interval of less than > five minutes with TPC/IP connections, but to use UDP. Many T2 servers provide > this possibility on port 8080. It drastically reduced the overhead for > the servers > and the clients by avoiding the connect/disconnect overhead. You are right for simple position beaconing. However, the TCP connection has the huge advantage of also providing APRS information _to_ the user, which is lacking with UDP. As I already outlined, the default behavior in APRSdroid is to keep the connection open and to display the incoming packets to the user. I have triangulated that individual offender and will write him a polite off-list message to see how I can improve the situation. Kind regards, Georg DO1GL -- APRSdroid - Open Source APRS Client for Android ++ http://aprsdroid.org/m ++ https://market.android.com/details?id=org.aprsdroid.app ++ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 828 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20120416/18ade07e/attachment.pgp>
- Previous message: [aprssig] Excessive beacons/connects by "smart" IS clients
- Next message: [aprssig] N666BK-1 no legal call what so ever...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
