[aprssig] Wind/Gust Units Clarification
Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr) ldeffenb at homeside.toThu Aug 30 23:11:04 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [aprssig] GPS for D-700
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
With ISAAC rampaging through the United States, I've had occasion to review my parsing of various weather packets and have encountered a discrepancy between several wind speed specs. The basic question is what are the units of the three different representations of wind and gust data in APRS weather packets. There's the s and g terms of Positionless Weather Data and the Wind Direction and Wind Speed Data Extension as it replaces the s term in a Complete Weather Report. First, from aprs101.pdf, I read that the Positionless Weather data s and g terms are in mph: > s = sustained one-minute wind speed (in mph). > g = gust (peak wind speed in mph in the last 5 minutes). The Complete Weather Report doesn't re-define the g term, so I assume it is also in mph. However, the Wind Direction and Wind Speed Data Extension (DIR/SPD) appears to be in knots: > The 7-byte DIR/SPD Data Extension can be used to represent the wind > direction and sustained one-minute wind speed in a Weather Report. > The wind direction is expressed in degrees (001-360), clockwise from due > north. The speed is expressed in knots. A slash / character separates > the two. Ok, so that's what I was about to cement into my code, but then I noticed that the wxnow.txt documentation which claims to be the format used in APRS's "complete weather reports" (http://wiki.sandaysoft.com/a/Wxnow.txt) says: > Feb 01 2009 12:34 > 272/010g006t069r010p030P020h61b10150 > > The second line is the wx report, in the format used in APRS "complete > weather reports". The format is: > > * 272 - wind direction - 272 degrees > * 010 - wind speed - 10 mph > * g006 - wind gust - 6 mph > * t069 - temperature - 69 degrees F > So, is the speed mph (per wxnow.txt) or knots (per aprs101.pdf)? I suspect that many APRS weather transmitting programs simply trust the wxnow.txt contents and wrap it in a packet to transmit it. aprs.fi certainly seems to interpret it this way (both as mph). I checked the 1.1 and 1.2 addenda mentions of weather, but found nothing at either: http://www.aprs.org/aprs11/spec-wx.txt http://www.aprs.org/aprs12/weather-new.txt I don't personally own a weather station, so I'm not able to compare the actual readings to what values are transmitting in a packet, but I'd really like to make sure that APRSISCE/32 is interpreting based on reality and not blindly implementing a spec that others have not adhered to before me. If there is anyone with a good memory as to which is correct, I'd appreciate that knowledge. If there's anyone with a real weather station, it would be interesting to know what station through what software is putting what values/units into their raw APRS packets. At this point, I don't think we can trust what any particular client displays, but I'd like a comparison of actual measured values vs raw packet contents. Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRISSCE for Windows Mobile and Win32 PS. The http://www.aprs.org/aprs12/weather-new.txt seems to describe a packet format that I've also not seen anywhere else with slashes between every term. Is this a case of not referring to the current spec when authoring this page or is it truly specifying a new format? Or am I not remembering something mentioned elsewhere? Specifically: > Thus, the usual APRS > weather report string similar to: > > DIR/SPD/Gggg/Tttt/Rrrr/Pppp etc > > is extended by adding these additional parameters for but this is more like what I'd expect from aprs101.pdf: > SInce the wind direction and speed and temperature are required fields, > this means the minimum weather report with flood info is > > WX symbol -plus- .../...t...VxxxFxxxx but then it goes on to say: > Examples are: > > Weather Station reports with flood gage readings: > > DDMM.hhN/DDDMM.hhW_ddd/sss/Gggg/Tttt/Fxxxx... > DDMM.hhN/DDDMM.hhW_ddd/sss/Gggg/Tttt/Fxxxx/Vvvv... > DDMM.hhN/DDDMM.hhW_ddd/sss/Gggg/Tttt/Rrrr/PppppFxxxx... I remain confused by the conflicting specifications... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20120830/ce63f6b9/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: [aprssig] GPS for D-700
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
