[aprssig] AX.25 RR bit test - Holy Grail?
Gregg Wonderly gregg at wonderly.orgTue Dec 4 19:02:59 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [aprssig] AX.25 RR bit test - possible format
- Next message: [aprssig] CNSP-18
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
We still really should consider a new transport such as OpenTrac for data encapsulation. This text stuff is really getting monotonous and extensibility inabilities have continued to plague so many potential applications. Gregg Wonderly W5GGW Sent from my iPhone On Nov 30, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Jason KG4WSV <kg4wsv at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Andrew P. <andrewemt at hotmail.com> wrote: >> Just as a reminder, these bits are in AX.25 headers. > > IMO, it's a mistake to shove layer 3+ data into layer 2 (data link) fields, both for specific reasons like Andrew points out, and just on general principle. > > -Jason > kg4wsv > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at tapr.org > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20121204/f130342a/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: [aprssig] AX.25 RR bit test - possible format
- Next message: [aprssig] CNSP-18
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
