[aprssig] POI engine on APRS-IS

[Bill Vodall]

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Bob Bruninga <bruninga at usna.edu> wrote:
>> To have an object server respond to three different
>> destination address is a waste of  the system,...
>> this would preclude anybody having say a "QRZ" server
>> that dished up QRZ responses for example.
>
> Quite the contrary.  We only need one QRZ server independent of whether you
> are asking about an OBJECT or a STATION or anything else.

... and a backup...   Any time there's only one of something it's
asking for failure when you need it the most.

How about these IS based servers have a common name to differentiate
them from local RF based servers.   So here this could be something
like "IQRZ."

Bill - WA7NWP