[aprssig] !x! (was: IS-to-RF proposal (rev b))

[Jason KG4WSV]

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Heikki Hannikainen <hessu at hes.iki.fi> wrote:
> It is implemented for object descriptions (and items and other position
> formats), but as described above, it needs to go in the beginning of the
> comment. It might make more sense to have it in the end so it would not
> affect the readability.

The proposed spec says "Any packet containing this string should not
be archived".  Your requirement for the position of !x! does not meet
spec.

The proposed spec says "should" and this certainly seems like a case
for a "shall" instead of "should".

-Jason
kg4wsv