[aprssig] OT: Yaesu to release digital amateur radio gear
John Gorkos jgorkos at gmail.comMon Jan 9 15:53:40 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [aprssig] OT: Yaesu to release digital amateur radio gear
- Next message: [aprssig] OT: Yaesu to release digital amateur radio gear
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Monday, January 09, 2012 09:29:02 AM Tim McDonough N9PUZ wrote: > On 1/9/2012 9:17 AM, John Gorkos wrote: > > <soapbox> > > > > I am aware of no other situation like this in amateur > > radio: If you built an FM transmitter, then anyone in the world with > > the > > correct knowledge can build an FM receiver that converts your RF signal > > into something anyone can receive. Same for SSB, AM, even PSK31 or > > WSPR. I can think of no other transmission that is legally made on the > > ham radio bands that I can't build a receiver or decoder for legally. > > Pactor III? I'll grant you that. OTOH, I know of no ARES groups or other emergency operations agencies that have entire operations plans built around PACTOR II or III. But I think we've established that I really don't know MUCH, and it's possible there are entire emergency networks waiting to spring into action during the next Joplin Tornado/Hurricane Andrew/Fukishima Power Plant event and coordinate responses and get information to family members, etc. using PACTOR II and PACTOR III. You raise an interesting point, though. PACTOR modems are extremely expensive, for no good reason other than that they are a proprietary, single source item. There's no reason that Byon or Scott or one of our resident electroics gurus couldn't make a DSP based PACTOR modem for $100-$200, given access to the proprietary algorithms that SCS uses. But SCS continues to charge outrageous prices for a fairly simple technology, limiting their penetration into the market. Also, they have commercial entities willing to pay that much for the modems, for commercial uses, so they have no incentive to drop the cost. How are DVSA and their AMBE chips different? The chances that DVSI will raise the cost of AMBE is easily as good as the chances they'll lower it. And I don't deny that they have a right to make money on their research. Again, my core beef isn't with DVSI, or even ICOM, it's with the ARRL and ultimately the FCC, for allowing commercial interests to buy their way into amateur spectrum with proprietary compression algorithms that are de facto encryption protocols. John Gorkos AB0OO > > Tim N9PUZ > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at tapr.org > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
- Previous message: [aprssig] OT: Yaesu to release digital amateur radio gear
- Next message: [aprssig] OT: Yaesu to release digital amateur radio gear
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
