[aprssig] RK3KKPK? (CONNECTED Igates?)

[Andrew P.]

Seriously, isn't that what APRS-IS is already? The only difference is that not every RF station is within direct (versus digipeated) contact range of a 2-way IGate.

Andrew Pavlin, KA2DDO

------Original Message------
From: Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)
To: aprssig at tapr.org
Sent: Jan 28, 2012 8:53 PM
Subject: Re: [aprssig] RK3KKPK? (CONNECTED Igates?)


Doesn't that exist already?  I think it was "invented" by Al Gore and he 
called it... what was it....that thing that's just a series of pipes... 
Oh yeah, the Internet!

Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows Mobile and Win32

On 1/28/2012 8:45 PM, Bob Bruninga wrote:
>> looks like it just got solved, I picked up a message
>> on my packet bbs from RK3KPK, looks like he is using
>> internet gateways and that might explain him ending
>> up on 144.390 thinking it was a lap.
> Very interesting.  I had forgotten so much about regular packet!!!  SO somehow there was a wormhole from regular packet to 144.39 in Southern California?
>
> Come to think about it, have I been asleep?  Why couldn't we have an IGate system on 145.01 all over the USA linked into an IGATE system so that everyone's TNC was only a one-hop CONNECT away from any other TNC in the world?
>
> We could call it APRS-CONNECT on 145.01 (if it has not been taken over by a DX cluster)...
>
> Bob, WB4APR
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>


_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
aprssig at tapr.org
https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry