[aprssig] RK3KKPK? (CONNECTED Igates?)
Bob Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduTue Jan 31 00:38:01 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [aprssig] RK3KKPK? (CONNECTED Igates?)
- Next message: [aprssig] RK3KKPK? (CONNECTED Igates?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Great!... With the proviso, that it should target 145.01 or other locally available packet channel and NOT 144.39. Maybe 145.55 is an alternative if a DX cluster is already there somewhere... Bob, Wb4APR -----Original Message----- From: aprssig-bounces at tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces at tapr.org] On Behalf Of Steve Dimse Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 8:06 AM To: TAPR APRS Mailing List Subject: Re: [aprssig] RK3KKPK? (CONNECTED Igates?) On (the last few days), (various people) wrote (things like): > And, of course, two sets of routing tables, two sets of addresses, two > sets of address resolution/mapping protocols and so on. > It is easy to fall into a tendency to over-engineer things. People sometimes talk about redoing the APRS IS for a variety of reasons, but if it were complex it never would have gained traction (just as their proposals to re-engineer never gain traction). I was actually guilty of this, I had a rather complex plan when the idea for the APRS IS formed, but I am eternally indebted to Keith WU2Z, who convinced me if the importance of simplicity if I wanted it to catch on. Here is a relatively simple way to do what Bob proposes, call the concept CGate, for Connected Gateway. The CGate listens on RF, when it hears the RF beacon of a local station it sends a packet to the internet backbone with the RF station's call and the CGate's IP number or DNS name. The packet could be either a new APRS packet type, a user-defined packet type, or even just a position report with a comment like "CGate via cgate.k4hg.net" or "CGate via 64.76.23.1"on a regular position packet. The internet backbone could be the APRS IS itself or a stand-alone net using javAPRSSrv and/or aprsd. The CGate listens on the internet and builds its own flat database of all the beacons and the CGate that heard them. Call this a routing table if you want, but this is quite simple and reasonably scaleable, even low-end computers could handle tables with half a million lines easily. To initiate a connect I would type into the tnc "C WB4APR VIA CGATE". A local CGate could hear the connection request, look in its table for WB4APR, if it finds an entry it connects to the CGate that heard WB4APR, and that CGate sends out a connect request that prints like "K4HG>WB4APR,CGATE*".
- Previous message: [aprssig] RK3KKPK? (CONNECTED Igates?)
- Next message: [aprssig] RK3KKPK? (CONNECTED Igates?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
