[aprssig] 30M APRS and digipeaters... (aliases)
Stephen H. Smith wa8lmf2 at aol.comFri Jul 13 01:19:50 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [aprssig] 30M APRS and digipeaters... (aliases)
- Next message: [aprssig] 30M APRS and digipeaters... (aliases)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 7/12/2012 9:02 PM, Bob Bruninga wrote: > Now if someone with in-depth HF propagation smarts and experience wanted to designate a system of LINKED path of specific digipaters, where they are spaced such that each one only hears its two adjacent neighbors and has a low probablity of hearing the hop beyond, then I would not object to experimenting with such a linear path system. > > I think the HF experts could reasonably answer the question as follows: > > WHAT is the optimum distance X for a 30m reliable QSO. Then what is the distance Y which seems to be nearly impossible. Then hopefully X is something similar to 1/2 of Y and space the digipeaters accordingly. The intractable problem is that THERE IS NO SINGLE OPTIMUM DISTANCE. For any given location, the optimum distance is constantly changing, hour-by-hour, day-to-night, the season of the year, the position in the 11-year solar cycle, and randomly when solar flares explode. Speaking of flares, we got popped by a BIG one earlier today. Check out the NOAA/NASA X-Ray flux chart on my website at: . <http://wa8lmf.net/map> Take a look before it scrolls off the three-day chart.
- Previous message: [aprssig] 30M APRS and digipeaters... (aliases)
- Next message: [aprssig] 30M APRS and digipeaters... (aliases)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
