[aprssig] radio aprs vs internet aprs
Tom Hayward esarfl at gmail.comTue Mar 20 14:13:03 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [aprssig] radio aprs vs internet aprs
- Next message: [aprssig] radio aprs vs internet aprs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 07:23, Mike Goldweber <mike at mikegoldweber.name> wrote: > The next day I ran into the guy who organized and ran the communications. > He told me that he got the message when he linked his system to the > internet, but during the race he comm's trailer was not linked to the > internet, which is why he did not receive my message immediately. This statement is misleading. RF APRS and APRS-IS are both realtime networks, and so data must be received immediately or not at all. The only way he could have seen your message a day later is by referencing an archived history of APRS-IS data (e.g., aprs.fi, findu, or his personal log). Think of APRS-IS as just another frequency, lets call it 2.4 GHz. He was on 144.39 MHz and you were on 2.4 GHz, so normally you wouldn't be able to communicate. I-gates exist to gate messages between networks. If there was a properly configured I-gate in your area, your message would have been passed from "2.4 GHz" to 144.39 MHz and your friend would have received it. It sounds like your area does not have a transmit-capable I-gate. I-gates are easy to operate once you collect all the required equipment (antenna, 2m radio, TNC, computer, and Internet connection). This may be a good project for you to pursue. Tom KD7LXL
- Previous message: [aprssig] radio aprs vs internet aprs
- Next message: [aprssig] radio aprs vs internet aprs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
