[aprssig] Why different freq in Europe vs US?
R. Rochte rochte at gmail.comMon Mar 26 16:52:47 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [aprssig] Why different freq in Europe vs US?
- Next message: [aprssig] Why different freq in Europe vs US?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Why, though, are the different frequencies used? Why not standardize on one throughout the world? Is there some compelling reason for Europe to not use the U.S. frequency, or vice-versa? 73, Robert KC8UCH On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Steve Daniels < steve at daniels270.eclipse.co.uk> wrote: > ** ** ** > > There are around 6 different frequencies in use depending where you are in > the world, normally it makes no difference, but ideally for things like > transatlantic balloons, the ability to change frequency based on longitude > would be good.**** > > At the moment stations in **Europe** switch frequency to try and receive > the balloons, sadly I cannot easily switch the 144.390 with my APRS system > **** > > ** ** > > Steve Daniels**** > > G6UIM**** > ------------------------------ > > *From:* aprssig-bounces at tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces at tapr.org] *On > Behalf Of *R. Rochte > *Sent:* 26 March 2012 17:06 > *To:* **TAPR APRS Mailing List** > *Subject:* [aprssig] Why different freq in Europe vs ****US****?**** > > ** ** > > Why are different frequencies used for APRS in Europe and **North America* > *? **** > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at tapr.org > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20120326/159c9e35/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: [aprssig] Why different freq in Europe vs US?
- Next message: [aprssig] Why different freq in Europe vs US?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
