[aprssig] Why different freq in Europe vs US?
R. Rochte rochte at gmail.comTue Mar 27 02:22:15 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [aprssig] Why different freq in Europe vs US?
- Next message: [aprssig] Why different freq in Europe vs US?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wow - thanks for the many detailed replies! I'll have to re-read the one below a few times until it all sinks in... I wish we could "sticky" posts like this somewhere... Is anyone running an APRS wiki? 73, Robert On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Steve Dimse <steve at dimse.com> wrote: > > On Mar 26, 2012, at 12:06 PM, R. Rochte wrote: > > > Why are different frequencies used for APRS in Europe and North America? > > You wouldn't believe how incredibly hard it was to get a single frequency > for APRS just in North America! > > APRS came late to the 2 meter party, the bandplan never anticipated there > may someday be a system that could benefit from a single nationwide > frequency. Use of the band was coordinated locally and therefore had no > single open frequency that could be used everywhere in the US. In the early > days APRS activity was on 145.79 (generally designated an experimental > freq, APRS was experimental then) and 145.01 (a digital freq often > coordinated for packet nodes and BBS) in the US along with a few local > areas using other frequencies. Most of Canada used 144.39. A proposal was > made by the Shuttle Amateur radio Experiment (SAREX) in the late 1990s to > move APRS to 144.39 in the US so the soon-to-be-built ISS could use 145.800 > worldwide (it was useless over US due to QRM from 145.79). > > A huge amount of angst followed, including some prominent APRS leaders > arguing that SAREX promises of APRS on the ISS were a lie to grab our freq, > and a nationwide donation fund for crystals, duplexers, and other hardware > changes needed for the new freq. > > Before the new millennium began APRS was on a single North American freq, > making it better than before. SAREX, now ARISS, has certainly delivered on > it promises. The doom predicted by weak signal operators at the low end of > 2 meters never materialized. The great APRS QSY turned out to be one of > those rare things in ham radio that worked out for everyone. > > I can't imagine that ever happening on a worldwide basis, where either > North America or Europe initiates a QSY to accommodate the rare > trans-atlantic balloon flight! > > Steve K4HG > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at tapr.org > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20120326/6c67db54/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: [aprssig] Why different freq in Europe vs US?
- Next message: [aprssig] Why different freq in Europe vs US?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
